In the minutes of the last assembly of Fenice Srl, the rift between its members reads the backlight. On the one hand there is the axis Chiara Ferragni – Paolo Barletta who together hold over 70% of the company’s shares, on the other Pasquale Morgese who opposed the decisions taken by the two.
Fenice Srl It is the most important society ofEmpire of Chiara Ferragni. Or rather, once the flagship was considered, when it recorded millionaire turnover and signed advertising contracts to manage Chiara Ferragni Brandthe brand with the winking eye imprinted on bags, make -ups and notebooks. After the Pandoro case is Fenice Srl the company that has undergone the greatest repercussions: here we explain well what is happening.
Net of business, however, there is a since it is now clear. The fees of Fenice Srl are divided into three parts. Chiara Ferragni through holding Sister’s manages 32.5% of shares, the entrepreneur Paolo Barletta with his Alchemy manages 40% and Pasquale Morgese holds 27.5%.
In recent months Fenice Srl has had to face several decisions For his future, all decisions that have had one clear geography: Ferragni and Barletta on one side, Morgese on the other. A division that was clear when Fenice had to vote for the capital increase, a necessary step for smooth out the losses and relaunch the company.
Chiara Ferragni opens the wallet, the members vote to fill the phenomena coffers: how much they paid
The minutes of Fenice Srl: “situation of extreme difficulty”
This division also reads in reports of the company reported by Radiocorthe press agency linked to Sole 24 hours. Here you read the answers given by Claudio Calabi to Pasquale MorgeseCalabi is the sole administrator after Ferragni’s step back: “There was no optimistic forcing, nor pessimistic overestimation in determining the budget items”.
Calabi responds to Criticism raised by Morgese In recent months, inside and outside the Fenice Assemblies. Calabi explains that: “He has always operated exclusively in the interest of the company to protect members and creditors. Therefore, he rejects the charge of having acted with different criteria”. And again: “Some partners have put in place very invasive control activities, thanks to which they have been able to have a total content of the progress of the social management and the patrimonial consistency of the company”.
